Press secretary Dana Perino tries to spin this, but the bottom line is that Bush lied.

Of course there is nothing surprising about Bush lying. But it is surprising that the truth is coming out on the MSM.

Clinton was impeached for lying about his liaison with jewess Monica Lewinsky. How much more should Bush be impeached for trying to lie his way into war with Iran.

“Asked if he had been “hyping” the threat from Iran, Bush said he was only made aware of the NIE last week and insisted it had changed nothing. ‘I still feel strongly that Iran is a danger. I think the NIE makes it clear that Iran needs to be taken seriously as a threat to peace. My opinion hasn’t changed.’”

So who is lying, Hadley (“As I say, it was, in my recollection, is in the last few months”) or Bush (“only made aware of the NIE last week”)? Ask who has the motivation to lie and you have the answer.

Aside from the fact that there is no evidence that Iran had a bomb program, this report confirms what I wrote last January. It also suggests (to use a diplomatic term) that the Bush Administration has been caught in yet another lie.

Here is what Steve Hadley, National Security Adviser said in an interview today (December 4):

REPORTER: Steve [Hadley, National Security Adviser], what is the first time the president was given the inkling that something? I’m not clear on this. Was it months ago, when the first information started to become available to intelligence agencies? […]

HADLEY: [W]hen was the president notified that there was new information available? We’ll try and get you a precise answer. As I say, it was, in my recollection, is in the last few months. Whether that’s October — August-September, we’ll try and get you an answer for that.

Here is what Bush said in October:

REPORTER: But you definitively believe Iran wants to build a nuclear weapon?

BUSH: I think so long — until they suspend and/or make it clear that they — that their statements aren’t real, yeah, I believe they want to have the capacity, the knowledge, in order to make a nuclear weapon. […]

So I’ve told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon. I take the threat of Iran with a nuclear weapon very seriously.

Does anyone want to bet me that Hadley never comes back with the promised answer?

What FOX does not say is that the attack will almost certainly include nukes.

Many things come to mind, but I will mention just two.

1) I don’t think the Cryptocracy has enough chutzpah to attack Iran before another terrorist event on American soil or on American troops. Look for for something big in the next few months.

2) Then their is the absurdity of nuking Iran. “Nuclear weapons are so bad that we will nuke any nation (who does not go along with our agenda) who even appears to be developing them.”  This is just the cover story, of course, but it will probably be easy to sell the American goyim; especially after the staged terror event.

Here is from an interview from just four days ago given by former Penna Senator Santorum. Look for the prediction of something “unfortunate” happening to change American’s minds. We also now know that the Big Three are in on the scam. Remember that, when it hits.

“I think all of [the main Republican candidates] understand the issue very, very well, they understand particularly the importance of Iran, and confronting Iran in the Middle East as an absolute lynchpin for our success in that region, and … they also understand that between now and November, a lot of things are going to happen, and I believe that by this time next year, the American public’s going to have a very different view of this war, and it will be because, I think, of some unfortunate events, that like we’re seeing unfold in the UK.”

(Emphasis added by me, and thanks to this lewrockwell article for bringing the interview to my attention.)

Here is a good analysis of the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) translation that this resolution is based on. And for those who have not heard of MEMRI, here is a good introduction.

Apropos nothing (well perhaps something) it is interesting to note the names of the U.S. carriers.

Of the ten Nimitz class nuclear powered carriers, seven are named after U.S. Presidents:

George Washington (CVN-73)
Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72)
Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71)
Harry S. Truman (CVN-75)
Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)
Ronald Reagan (CVN-76)
George H. W. Bush (CVN-77)

Add to the first of a new class of supercarriers currently being build, Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78).

See a pattern? All save the George Washington (whose namesake would not approve) and the “Hiroshima” Harry are named after Republicans.

Pace is still a company man (you don’t get to be a full bird colonal, let alone the a 4-star general, without going along). But at least it seems he is a company man who has his limits. And even the most reasonable and unobjectionable limits is too much for U.S./Judaic War Machine Inc.

As for jury nullification, there are ways of not letting the slimeball lawyers and judges know that we hold to our Constitutional rights. And if we ever become empanelled on a jury, our deliberations are secret and no reason need be given for an acquittal.