<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie. Singin&#8217; in the Rain, 1952. (HIx: 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstword.us/2007/02/movie-singin-in-the-rain-1952-hix-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstword.us/2007/02/movie-singin-in-the-rain-1952-hix-2/</link>
	<description>How can you have the last word if you haven't heard the first?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:33:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vanishing American</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2007/02/movie-singin-in-the-rain-1952-hix-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanishing American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 06:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://butler-harris.org/archives/165#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>This is one of those movies that everybody seems to love, and I&#039;ve watched and enjoyed it several times. After a few viewings, though, I began to notice the caricaturing of silent films and silent film actors. I noticed it more after I had seen many silent movies; the movie looks down silent films, which were made out to be quaint and corny, and silent actors were the butt of many jokes. The condescension bothered me.
&#039;Lina Lamont&#039; was too cartoonish to be remotely believable, with her exaggerated voice and accent.
Another irony I&#039;ve noticed is that Debbie Reynolds&#039; supposedly superior voice is dubbed in for Lina Lamont&#039;s, when in actuality,Jean Hagen (Lamont) is singing for Debbie on at least one song. (&#039;I Would, Would You?&#039;)
The music in the film is good, but the title song &#039;Singin&#039; in the Rain&#039; is a period song which made its debut back in the 20s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those movies that everybody seems to love, and I&#8217;ve watched and enjoyed it several times. After a few viewings, though, I began to notice the caricaturing of silent films and silent film actors. I noticed it more after I had seen many silent movies; the movie looks down silent films, which were made out to be quaint and corny, and silent actors were the butt of many jokes. The condescension bothered me.<br />
&#8216;Lina Lamont&#8217; was too cartoonish to be remotely believable, with her exaggerated voice and accent.<br />
Another irony I&#8217;ve noticed is that Debbie Reynolds&#8217; supposedly superior voice is dubbed in for Lina Lamont&#8217;s, when in actuality,Jean Hagen (Lamont) is singing for Debbie on at least one song. (&#8216;I Would, Would You?&#8217;)<br />
The music in the film is good, but the title song &#8216;Singin&#8217; in the Rain&#8217; is a period song which made its debut back in the 20s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razzendahcuben</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2007/02/movie-singin-in-the-rain-1952-hix-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>razzendahcuben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 03:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://butler-harris.org/archives/165#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>Ah, my favorite movie of all time.

I can&#039;t tell if your criticisms are criticisms against the movie itself, or if you are simply pointing out the satire within the movie.

And Gene Kelly&#039;s voice is &lt;i&gt;weak&lt;/i&gt;? Not at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, my favorite movie of all time.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t tell if your criticisms are criticisms against the movie itself, or if you are simply pointing out the satire within the movie.</p>
<p>And Gene Kelly&#8217;s voice is <i>weak</i>? Not at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

