Comments on: Martin Luther King’s Plagiarism

By: Joshua

Joshua — Sat, 03 May 2008 04:17:00 +0000

Number 3 is a classic example of “wordism.” Perhpas Iva should read the linked article from the Gedankenexperiment post.

By: TJH

TJH — Sat, 03 May 2008 00:16:03 +0000

Actually, I’m more like a throwback to 1400 BC.

By: TJH

TJH — Fri, 02 May 2008 20:14:05 +0000

Iva — let me make sure I’ve got it. Being a life-long cheat is no big deal; but being a throwback to 1956 is unforgiveable! You are indeed a girl of your times.

By: ivagrey

ivagrey — Fri, 02 May 2008 18:34:54 +0000

Wow! Totally laugh-worthy. I love how when you want to criticize blacks you call them “Negroes” and when, in your third-to-last paragraph, you pretend you are really only looking out for their interests, you deign to actually refer to them as blacks. Thanks for letting us know that you write your internet posts from the year 1956. So long, grampaw!

By: Mocheirge

Mocheirge — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:52:49 +0000

Alert Algore! His Internet paternity claim is being challenged!

The Discussion page for the wiki entry is also amusing: “OK, which White Nationalist wrote this page?” I suppose the same White Nationalist who made Emeagwali’s personal website, since the claims come from it.

By: MRB

MRB — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:02:42 +0000

Michael Luther is not the only Negro intellectual to have been given a free ride by the judaic media. It looks like Philip Emeagwali is also a fraud. Before reading the linked article below, first read his Wiki bio. Pay special attention to the section entitled "claims" and notice that no citation is given for any of them. Now read this brief expose of Mr. Emeagwali. The only difference between these two frauds is that the University of Michigan refused to give Emeagwali a Ph.D., even though he took them to court to force them to.