Honor Thyself Today, O Voter

Posted by T on February 18, 2008
Current Flux

A quick Google search indicates that different organizations claim today’s holiday as (a) Washington’s birthday (in which case, “President’s Day”), or plural “Presidents’ Day,” with either the interpretation of (b) “Washington and Lincoln,” or (c) “all presidents.” Apparently, at the Federal level, it is technically still (a), though Nixon issued a proclamation making it (b); but the public, no doubt following advertisers’ lead, mostly believes the reference to be (c).

This kind of ambiguity is typical of our modern age. Nothing ever settled, nothing ratified, as the Patton character in Patton says.

The most common interpretation (c) is particularly absurd. As if every politician should be honored, however crooked he might be, merely for winning an election.

If everyone wins, no one wins; if everyone is set apart for an honor, no one is set apart for that honor.

Honoring every winner is really to flatter the voters more than to honor the winner. Their infinite wisdom is such that they must always choose the best man, or at least a man worthy of honor, regardless of who wins: the Voice of the People has spoken, and all of us voters should feel proud, even if we foolishly voted for the guy that lost. We too should “mischen unsren Jubel ein!”

It should be called Vox Populi Day.

Although, the foolishness can be set in even sharper relief: we are really being asked to honor him who has been declared the winner of an election, i.e. regardless of who actually was voted for the greatest number of times. “I don’t care who votes, I only care who counts the votes,” Stalin is supposed to have said.

In the event, perhaps it should be renamed, “Honoring the Vote-Counters’ Day.”

3 Comments to Honor Thyself Today, O Voter

  1. Don’t forget to include the Electoral College in your celebrations!

    Comment by TurretinFan — February 18, 2008 @ 1:49 pm
  2. T-fan — yes, the Electoral College adds a nuance to my phrase “voted for the greatest number of times” but I decided to skip that detail as it doesn’t change the point in this case.

    Apropos that, however: we need to strengthen the Electoral College concept next time, by giving just one single vote to each state, regardless of size.

    Comment by TJH — February 18, 2008 @ 2:02 pm
  3. Interesting video on some suspcious activity at the New Hampshire Primary. The “officials” refuse to give real anwers as to why they are violating the rules governing the storage of voting tickets. Check it out.

    It is definitely the counter, not the voter, that counts.

    Comment by Joshua — February 20, 2008 @ 12:59 am

Leave a comment

WP_Big_City