Well I figured it fit the post so I placed it here.
It seems that for something that happened 1n Germany or the surrounding areas, on such a large scale, they are trying very hard to prove that it did happen? Its like they need all this to prove the point. To which I start to get suspicious.
I sorta see the Kristalnacht as sort of a backlash, equal to the riots in Los Angeles after the Rodney King beating. This pent up anger for a people group that have an idea that they have been wronged (the German Goyim) towards the wrong doers the Jewish shop owners. That something set them (the Germans) off and this was sorta payback for being cheated in someway.

Sorry I did not get more to the point in my post above.

I was also wondering why the changing of dates and figures, I think the Deutchawelle post has made the idea that there was even earlier in 1938 camp deaths and the figure was I think 11 mill. total. The Auschwitz post had a date of around 1940-41 and they to where hinting at an earlier than history noted beginning of the Final Solution.

I am just trying to understand why all the lack of “proof or knowledge” of something that “happened on such a large scale”. That is all.

It becomes like Evolution no real proof , but if you do not believe your a fool. that being said I think something did happen I would just like to know on what scale and get the facts straight. As we have stated before and in a post I have been working on, the following can be stated if we do not follow the Historic Line we become Jew haters or Anti-Semites. This is no less dangerous than the supposed historic line of the Jews against the German government at the time of the 1940s.

s. hoffmeister

“The newly found Auschwitz blueprints are dated October 23 1941 and could offer historians earlier evidence of Nazi plans to kill Jews on a mass scale, Bild said.”

Jews wreck whole nations, and celebrate it for hundreds of years.

Some Germans wreck a few synagogues, and their descendants lament it to the third and fourth generation.

s.hoffmeister

“The international dimensions to the Holocaust were unprecedented and unreplicated since. The Holocaust was a crime in which virtually every country in the globe was complicit. It gave us examples worldwide of good as well as evil.”

“Anti-Semitism is unique because the situation of Israel is unique. Israel is the only country in the world whose very existence is under attack. The Holocaust and struggle against anti-Semitism, because they are seen as reasons for the existence of the State of Israel, are uniquely attacked and must be uniquely supported.”

Every nation on the globe was complicit in the holocaust, Israel is a unique, “anti-semitism” is a special sin of the most pernicious nature. Thus, says the author.

Here we witness what I wrote about in the above post. The holocaust the central event in history. The jews are special and anyone who denies this truth is a heretic. Just ask John Hagee.

“I remember a pamphlet by that able and sincere secularist,
Mr. G. W. Foote, which contained a phrase sharply symbolizing and
dividing these two methods. The pamphlet was called BEER AND BIBLE,
those two very noble things, all the nobler for a conjunction which
Mr. Foote, in his stern old Puritan way, seemed to think sardonic,
but which I confess to thinking appropriate and charming.
I have not the work by me, but I remember that Mr. Foote dismissed
very contemptuously any attempts to deal with the problem
of strong drink by religious offices or intercessions, and said
that a picture of a drunkard’s liver would be more efficacious
in the matter of temperance than any prayer or praise.
In that picturesque expression, it seems to me, is perfectly
embodied the incurable morbidity of modern ethics.
In that temple the lights are low, the crowds kneel, the solemn
anthems are uplifted. But that upon the altar to which all men
kneel is no longer the perfect flesh, the body and substance
of the perfect man; it is still flesh, but it is diseased.
It is the drunkard’s liver of the New Testament that is marred
for us, which which we take in remembrance of him.”