<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our fearless leaders strike back&#8230; with their hankies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/</link>
	<description>How can you have the last word if you haven't heard the first?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:33:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: danielj</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/comment-page-1/#comment-5528</link>
		<dc:creator>danielj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 10:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstword.us/?p=628#comment-5528</guid>
		<description>http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_052309.htm

A letter I wrote to VDare inspired by your post was published at the above link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_052309.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_052309.htm</a></p>
<p>A letter I wrote to VDare inspired by your post was published at the above link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The North is Full of Tangled Things &#124; Spirit/Water/Blood</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/comment-page-1/#comment-4337</link>
		<dc:creator>The North is Full of Tangled Things &#124; Spirit/Water/Blood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstword.us/?p=628#comment-4337</guid>
		<description>[...] Tim Harris is one of our all-time favorite writers. He asks Chuck Baldwin what is the point of a non-violent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim Harris is one of our all-time favorite writers. He asks Chuck Baldwin what is the point of a non-violent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJH</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/comment-page-1/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>TJH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstword.us/?p=628#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>Shotgun -- take it from an aging bachelor -- you should not regard any other goal as more important! Hopefully, your future lady will not so much be part of a militia so much as hosting tea parties in support thereof!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shotgun &#8212; take it from an aging bachelor &#8212; you should not regard any other goal as more important! Hopefully, your future lady will not so much be part of a militia so much as hosting tea parties in support thereof!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shotgun</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/comment-page-1/#comment-4175</link>
		<dc:creator>Shotgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstword.us/?p=628#comment-4175</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;d like to add something; (because I know the calibre of guys that read / comment here at First Word...)

If any of you ever see a young (single) lady participating in a militia group (around the Virginia area...) let me know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;d like to add something; (because I know the calibre of guys that read / comment here at First Word&#8230;)</p>
<p>If any of you ever see a young (single) lady participating in a militia group (around the Virginia area&#8230;) let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJH</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/comment-page-1/#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator>TJH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstword.us/?p=628#comment-4056</guid>
		<description>Shotgun -- we&#039;re going to need lots of you guys. Keep a low profile, and learn to sniff out friends or thinkers that cd be brought over without giving away too much at first. No I didn&#039;t mean to imply that you insulted them -- on the contrary, I could tell you had a fundamental affection, and I was preaching to the world so to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shotgun &#8212; we&#8217;re going to need lots of you guys. Keep a low profile, and learn to sniff out friends or thinkers that cd be brought over without giving away too much at first. No I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that you insulted them &#8212; on the contrary, I could tell you had a fundamental affection, and I was preaching to the world so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shotgun</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/comment-page-1/#comment-4053</link>
		<dc:creator>Shotgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstword.us/?p=628#comment-4053</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean to sound insulting to the militia guys.  My heart goes out to them and I highly sympathize with their passion. 

Thanks for clarifying the issue for me Mr. TJH.  As a prospective Navy SEAL, I&#039;ll do my best to &quot;spread the word.&quot;  I just want to make darn sure I know what the &quot;word&quot; is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to sound insulting to the militia guys.  My heart goes out to them and I highly sympathize with their passion. </p>
<p>Thanks for clarifying the issue for me Mr. TJH.  As a prospective Navy SEAL, I&#8217;ll do my best to &#8220;spread the word.&#8221;  I just want to make darn sure I know what the &#8220;word&#8221; is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJH</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/comment-page-1/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>TJH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstword.us/?p=628#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>Shotgun -- you are raising two independent questions: (1) is a citizen militia practical in view of the high-tech powerful standing army of the US? and (2) is resistance of any kind biblical? Let me address the first in this reply:

I am using &quot;militia&quot; as an ideal type in this discussion -- the ideal being the entire male citizenry armed and ready to fall in for defense, much as is the case to this day in Switzerland; provided, however, that this militia can also rise up against usurpers in the government, kill them, and replace them with lawful members; and provided this can be done consistent with the law of God. So start with that abstract entity so defined.

A group of men, say, out in the hills of Wyoming calling themselves a &quot;militia&quot; are only an approximation to this concept; obviously some elements are missing. But rather than repudiate such a group, we should praise it as the vanguard and paradigm of what needs to happen when our people wake up collectively. Rather than insulting them and turning a blind eye when our oppressors persecute them, we should rally to their defense, each appropriate to his station, and encourage the further formation.

Yes, of course they would be sitting ducks if they came under attack of a Marine infantry battalion -- today. What we need, therefore, is for those Marine battalions, when the time is ripe, to peal off and take their rightful places as units of the militia. The word needs to be spread among military men; they need to start organizing and they will undoubtedly form the core of the leadership of the future militia. We will need many heroic &quot;Rambo&quot; types, as well as engineers, mechanics, artillery specialists, and so forth. It will be necessary to seize armories and bases, some of which will involve overcoming resistance from the traitorous lemmings that remain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shotgun &#8212; you are raising two independent questions: (1) is a citizen militia practical in view of the high-tech powerful standing army of the US? and (2) is resistance of any kind biblical? Let me address the first in this reply:</p>
<p>I am using &#8220;militia&#8221; as an ideal type in this discussion &#8212; the ideal being the entire male citizenry armed and ready to fall in for defense, much as is the case to this day in Switzerland; provided, however, that this militia can also rise up against usurpers in the government, kill them, and replace them with lawful members; and provided this can be done consistent with the law of God. So start with that abstract entity so defined.</p>
<p>A group of men, say, out in the hills of Wyoming calling themselves a &#8220;militia&#8221; are only an approximation to this concept; obviously some elements are missing. But rather than repudiate such a group, we should praise it as the vanguard and paradigm of what needs to happen when our people wake up collectively. Rather than insulting them and turning a blind eye when our oppressors persecute them, we should rally to their defense, each appropriate to his station, and encourage the further formation.</p>
<p>Yes, of course they would be sitting ducks if they came under attack of a Marine infantry battalion &#8212; today. What we need, therefore, is for those Marine battalions, when the time is ripe, to peal off and take their rightful places as units of the militia. The word needs to be spread among military men; they need to start organizing and they will undoubtedly form the core of the leadership of the future militia. We will need many heroic &#8220;Rambo&#8221; types, as well as engineers, mechanics, artillery specialists, and so forth. It will be necessary to seize armories and bases, some of which will involve overcoming resistance from the traitorous lemmings that remain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shotgun</title>
		<link>http://firstword.us/2009/03/our-fearless-leaders-strike-back-with-their-hankies/comment-page-1/#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator>Shotgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firstword.us/?p=628#comment-3795</guid>
		<description>Growing up, I used to idealize the concept of the militia.  I felt sort of like Winston in 1984:  &lt;i&gt;&quot;If there is hope, it lies in the proles.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I would drive by groups of hunters...all holding rifles and decked out in cammo;  having some idea of wilderness navigation and crude concepts of communications. My heart would leap for an instant...could it be?  Could they have the will to resist if it comes down to it? 

Since growing in my understanding, I&#039;ve come to question that sort of idea.  I&#039;ve observed that the only way a crook can succesfully avoid capture in a high-speed chase is if he has a clearly defined route and thought through plan of action.  

It&#039;s the same with these militia groups.  While rhetoric of &quot;hiding my guns&quot; and &quot;shootouts with federal agents&quot; has been on the rise since the election of Obama, (at least in the circles I frequent) I can&#039;t help but think of how futile and empty such statements are.  I&#039;ve seen army troops training to engage in domestic encounters.  No backwoods group of isolated rednecks is ready to counter such force...(God bless them.) It would be a slaughter. 

How can these milita groups formulate a systematic philosophy of resistence while still holding true to their lesser magistrates as well as Biblical concepts?   What is the legal way for a militia to act? 

I realize these questions are beyond the scope of the initial blog, but I can&#039;t help wondering about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Growing up, I used to idealize the concept of the militia.  I felt sort of like Winston in 1984:  <i>&#8220;If there is hope, it lies in the proles.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I would drive by groups of hunters&#8230;all holding rifles and decked out in cammo;  having some idea of wilderness navigation and crude concepts of communications. My heart would leap for an instant&#8230;could it be?  Could they have the will to resist if it comes down to it? </p>
<p>Since growing in my understanding, I&#8217;ve come to question that sort of idea.  I&#8217;ve observed that the only way a crook can succesfully avoid capture in a high-speed chase is if he has a clearly defined route and thought through plan of action.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same with these militia groups.  While rhetoric of &#8220;hiding my guns&#8221; and &#8220;shootouts with federal agents&#8221; has been on the rise since the election of Obama, (at least in the circles I frequent) I can&#8217;t help but think of how futile and empty such statements are.  I&#8217;ve seen army troops training to engage in domestic encounters.  No backwoods group of isolated rednecks is ready to counter such force&#8230;(God bless them.) It would be a slaughter. </p>
<p>How can these milita groups formulate a systematic philosophy of resistence while still holding true to their lesser magistrates as well as Biblical concepts?   What is the legal way for a militia to act? </p>
<p>I realize these questions are beyond the scope of the initial blog, but I can&#8217;t help wondering about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

