Comments on: The Hamites and the Hitler

By: danielj

danielj — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 05:38:59 +0000

He needs a theory to account for the persecution of all the groups that were persecuted.

Brilliant.

I wish I was smart as you. This philosophy degree is kicking my butt.

By: T

Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:39:14 +0000

Joel,
1. It is not your place to tell people to “keep their thoughts to themselves” on our blog. Is this chutzpah?
Hard-hitting analysis, probing questions are in bounds; issuing commands is not.
2. Jew does not need to be capitalized any more than “black” or “white.” It is a racial, not religious designation. Most jews are atheists, in fact, unless worship of self counts as theism.
The proper contrast to jew is not “Christian” but rather “gentile.” This is how jews divide the world. And in the kikenpress lexicography, jew is capitalized while Gentile is not. Consider the leader to a CBN interview here:
http://www.cbn.com/spirituallife/BibleStudyAndTheology/JewishRoots/Neither_Jew_Nor_Gentile.aspx
“you will learn the significance of Yom Kippur, the most important holiday in the Jewish year; God’s desire to see Jews and gentiles united; and Israel’s link to revival. ”
This is outrageous and we will need to re-train ourselves to think correctly by, for a time, upper-casing Gentile and lower-casing jew. This will fix the problem. It is kind of like having to recrease an envelope.
3. As to your being “suspicious,” suspicious of what? Surely not the dreaded A-word! I think we have exploded that concept adequately — you can do a search.
Merely announcing that you are suspicious is not very helpful, except perhaps to your future biographer, if he happens to be reading this blog. But it is actually not even going to be a very interesting footnote in your biography unless reasons, distinctions, clarifications are made — indeed, the very kind of clarity of thought that you so quickly demand of others.

By: Joel Peterson

Joel Peterson — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:10:16 +0000

What are you saying, Shotgun? Be more clear or keep your thoughts to yourself.

By: Shotgun

Shotgun — Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:17:30 +0000

I’m always suspicious of people who blaspheme in public and hate everything I believe in.

By: Joel Peterson

Joel Peterson — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:18:00 +0000

Is there a reason why TJH consistently fails to properly capitalize “Jew.” He capitalizes “Christian,” and he even capitalizes “Sodomites.” But “Jew” he more times than not leaves in lower case.

I’m always suspicious of people who do this.

By: Rachel Pender

Rachel Pender — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:38:10 +0000

Hitler Banned Darwin (see number 6)

Guidelines from Die BÃ¼cherei 2:6 (1935), p. 279

1. The works of traitors, emigrants and authors from foreign countries who believe they can attack and denigrate the new German (H.G. Wells, Rolland).

2. The literature of Marxism, Communism and Bolshevism.

3. Pacifist literature.

4. Literature with liberal, democratic tendencies and attitudes, and writing supporting the Weimar Republic (Rathenau, Heinrich Mann).

5. All historical writings whose purpose is to denigrate the origin, the spirit and the culture of the German Volk, or to dissolve the racial and structural order of the Volk, or that denies the force and importance of leading historical figures in favor of egalitarianism and the masses, and which seeks to drag them through the mud (Emil Ludwig).

6. Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (HÃ¤ckel).

7. Books that advocate “art” which is decadent, bloodless, or purely constructivist (Grosz, Dix, Bauhaus, Mendelsohn).

8. Writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus, completely destroy the principles of race and Volk (Hirschfeld).

9. The decadent, destructive and Volk-damaging writings of “Asphalt and Civilization” literati! (Graf, H. Mann, Stefan Zweig, Wassermann, Franz Blei). [transl. note: a derogatory term for writers dealing with upper middle class urban society].

10. Literature by Jewish authors, regardless of the field.

11. Popular entertainment literature that depicts life and life’s goals in a superficial, unrealistic and sickly sweet manner, based on a bourgeois or upper class view of life.

12. Nationalistic and patriotic kitsch in literature (P.O. HÃ¶cker!).

[Source for German text: pp. 143-144 of Strothmann, Dietrich. Nationalsozialistische Literaturpolitik: ein Beitrag zur Publizistik im Dritten Reich. Bonn: H. Bouvier, 1968. Translation by Dr. Roland Richter. Bold added.]

By: TJH

TJH — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:32:31 +0000

Thank you, Father, and you are right — our people are almost too far gone to be able to think about these things clearly. Here is the glimmer of hope, though. I, and I assume you too, used to think like they do. Yet something allowed us to clear the fog. Therefore, it can happen to them too. And I see signs everywhere that people are waking up. It’s only a snort and a flop of the arm so far, but maybe the giant is waking up.

By: Fr. John

Fr. John — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:16:09 +0000

Excellent analysis- sadly, for the vast majority of the ‘American Sheeople’, philosophical appeals to ad hominem, reductio ad absurdum, etc. go right over their heads… which means they STILL would not get the stuff about ‘H’ even when you spell it out to them- as you have done so well.

Bravo.

By: TJH

TJH — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:28:32 +0000

Well remember the old gag, “just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you.”

Today note that the business milieu is exactly the opposite. It’s always, “let’s not assign blame, let’s just fix the problem.” But this modern view suppressed justice — with a pious mask of magnanimity.

The problem with the jew is not his presence at the center of finance per se, but the fact that his ultimate motive therein is self-aggrandizement, not the prosperity of the nation. Plus, being part of a network that teaches him, with religious authority, that it is ok to trick and deceive goyim.

All of this is beside the point of the post, however. Here, the focus is on Ken Ham’s assertion of falsehoods, slandering people he knows next to nothing about, coupled with very bad logic to support his anti-evolution polemic.

By: Eliza

Eliza — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:54 +0000

Didn’t Hitler blame the Jews for financial troubles in Germany after WWI? They were the financiers and were relatively wealthy. Christians had little to do w/banking due to RC bans on usury during the Middle Ages. It’s human nature to want to blame people and find scapegoats.