Monthly Archives: January 2021

But even if it wasn’t stolen…

Posted by T on January 10, 2021
Judaica, Politics / No Comments

No rational person can believe that the 2020 election was not stolen, despite YouTube’s and Twitter’s schoolmarmish interposing of their own view to anyone that dissents.

There are a number of ways fraud occurs:

  • Dead people voting
  • Living but illegal people voting
  • Legal people voting more than once
  • Ballots being “lost” (whether physically or electronically does not matter)
  • Fake ballots being delivered
  • Machines not reporting the literal numbers

There is plenty of evidence that all six of these methods were in play. The first has been going on for a long time in the corrupted cities, and the second in California. The electoral college protected us from irreparable harm by quarantining those states to an extent.

One suspects the third, not just because of all the jews holding dual-residency in New York and Florida, not just because of the multiple voter-reminder notices I used to get when I lived in Pennsylvania, but the ominous adverts seen such as the ones telling students they could register to vote using their campus address. (Who would ever discover whether they were also registered back home? Especially, but not exclusively, out-of-state students.)


However, there is a seventh method that some would not even count as fraud, namely this: a technically-legal citizen is awakened from his lazy or drunken stupor by a partisan, who waves a filled-out mail-in ballot in front of him, which he signs, and the partisan puts it into the mailbox.

I count this method as fraud, because it highlights the fact that not just the legality of a vote is what should matter, but its mode. You want it to require a little effort: to have to go down to the county registrar’s office to register, in a timely manner, carrying some ID; to have to plan to go vote on election day, and to do so, rain or shine. This is the very least that should be required for your opinion to carry the weight of a vote.  People who only check a box when getting their driver’s license, and then have a ballot stuffed in front of their face which they reach out for and check the “more benefits” box should not be able to cancel out the votes of the men that wake up every day at 5 AM and trudge off for another day of hard work and tax-paying.

However, I don’t think Method Seven was the decisive part of the swing-state swing, because there is no reason such ballots would have shown up by the boxful at four in the morning. If they would be technically legal, why the need to wait? Why not have delivered them in a timely manner? Nevertheless, this category was doubtless a part of the margin, and threatens to become an ever bigger part of the tally in the future, if the mail-in method is allowed to continue.

But despite the variegated ways that fraud manifestly seems to have occurred, some still doubt it. But here’s the real thing. Either (1) the election was stolen, or (2) in the last four years, so many aliens have obtained the right to vote, that the descendants of the Europeans who, with so much sweat, blood, and toil, conquered and settled this continent, have now been defeated, and will soon be displaced from their own land. 

For anyone with eyes and the ability to reason, these seem to be the only two possibilities. Note also that these are not mutually exclusive: (1) and (2) could both be true. 

Most conservatives, I fear, would be fine with (2) being the case — provided it was done legally.  “They are just as much Americans as we are in that case — what’s the complaint?” The Propositional Nation is what matters to them, and they seem not to have the faintest inkling that even the propositions will be gone overnight once the descendants of the people that articulated those propositions have been displaced. 

But each new outrage gives a few of them the wakeup call, and they leave the mass of the Doomed and join us. The 911. The pointless, never-ending wars. The burning of Notre Dame. The Great 2020 Election Heist. And next: the total lockdown censorship being rolled out.

Welcome, ye whom God has wakened! We can enjoy one another’s fellowship even as we wonder how the Last Battle is going to be waged.

Why the Georgia runoff?

Posted by T on January 02, 2021
Judaica, Politics / No Comments

I think without the cheating, Trump not only would have won with a landslide exceeding that of Reagan in 84, but his coattails would have given him the House and a filibuster-proof Senate. 

In other words, there is no reason to think the cheating was limited to the “swing states,” and this point has not been made often enough.

Something like a third of a million fans came to Trump’s rallies since Labor Day, while about 68 came to the Law School Cheater’s — and that counts secret service agents and staff, some of whom arrived in cars so they could stupidly honk at the applause lines, to cover up the lack of actual applause. No one loves Biden. No one can possibly think that 15 million new people came out of the woodwork to vote for him. So, they are going to have to say that these 15 million were motivated by a hatred of Trump which trumped their apathy toward Biden. Even though Trump picked up a greater share of the negro and latino vote than four years ago.

This just cannot be believed rationally.

The only question that remains is, why did our rulers make it so there would need to be runoff in Georgia? They obviously could have stolen those two Senate seats outright; or, if the intent was to yield them to the yeomen of Georgia, why not have reduced the fake votes for Jew Ossoff and the Negro to the point that Loeffler and Perdue would have made it the first time? 

Distinguo the two possibilities.

I. The plan is to give one or both seats back to the goyim. (Either way, this would leave the Senate in GOP hands.)

In that case, it means a deal was made with Kemp and the Georgian GOP, and both sides carried out their side of the bargain. Kemp looked the other way, and the jews delivered as promised. In that case, the reason for the runoff would be to try to induce at least a large contingent of the election skeptics to say “I guess the elections really were fair, just like Facebook and CNN said!” If even half of the skeptics can be brought back over to trusting the system, it seems like that would be worth the hassle of staging a second election.

II. The plan is to take both seats

In this case, it is harder to see why they bothered with the runoff, when they could have stolen them at the outset. The only thing I can think of is, it could be purely to humiliate the peasants. It would be like Charlie Brown kicking the football which Lucy snatches away every time. It would be as if to say to the peasants, “you knew the election was stolen, yet you went back two months later and did it again, even though you knew that zero was done to rectify the holes in the system. You may now adapt your minds to the fact that our rule over you is permanent.”

The deeper the humiliation of the people, the less likely to rebel, might be the thinking.