Culture

Thou Shalt Not Remember Dresden

Posted by T on February 13, 2010
Current Discourse / 15 Comments

Pausing to remember with sorrow and respect the slaughter of Dresden by the Allies on Feb. 13, 1945, my heart is with the pious Germans who plan to attend the annual memorial there. This year, however, the girl-mayor of the city is organizing a human chain to “keep out the right wing extremists.”

Reconstructed Frauenkirche and square

We need to understand clearly that in modern German parlance, “right wing extremist” means, anyone that wants to remember his ancestors slaughtered by the “Allies,” unless he simultaneously confesses that they richly deserved to be slaughtered. This is what the rulers in Germany think, and an analogous viewpoint is held by our rulers. Therefore, it is worth while to reflect on this matter a little. I will do so by highlighting an anecdote from my own travel in Germany.

I was in Leipzig in December 2006 when Passau police chief Alois Mannichl was non-fatally stabbed, apparently at the door of his house. Instantly all the media — radio, TV, and newspaper — area-bombed the news that a “presumed right-wing extremist” (vermutlich Rechtsextremist), still at large, had done the deed. Every half hour on the radio, the same notice was given out.

Mannichl was a fanatical “anti-Nazi.” He had actually gone so far as to have the grave of a German dug up when he heard that a flag of the Third Reich had been draped over the body. In occupied Germany, such symbols are illegal. Showing Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will is illegal. Singing the Horst Wessel song is illegal. “This symbolism is illegal! We must seize the evidence” he must have screamed. Even the dead lying six feet under have no rest from zealots like him.

Mannichl had told police that a young man of such-and-such height and with a crewcut and a tattoo on his neck, before he jabbed the knife, had shouted, “with greetings from the national resistance.”

At the bar in the hotel lobby I had struck up an acquaintance with an amiable German who worked as federal police in the border control department.  I expressed doubt that the evidence that had been made public logically entailed that the deed was connected with “right-wing extremism” or even right-wing non-extremism. He said, they would not be claiming this if the investigation had not shown it. He knew, as a policeman. Trust the system, I suggested. Ja, he said.

Within days, perhaps just hours, all the pundits and politicians, like a flock of chirping sparrows, raised a unison cry that the NPD (National Democratic Party of Germany) — styled by our rulers as “neo-nazi,” presumably because it openly favors the continued biological existence of Germans –, should be outlawed. Even though no connection between the NPD and the skin-headed attacker had been made public! I encourage our readers to do a google search. Dozens of articles making this demand at the time can be scanned.

No suspect was apprehended, month after month. A strange detail leaked out: the knife used in the attack apparently came from Mannichl’s own kitchen.

A year after the attack, a few articles could be found that sheepishly conceded that the wound was probably received by Mannichl in a domestic dispute in his own household. Officially, the investigation is still “open” — even though finding a right-wing extremist with a tattoo visible on his neck ought to be exceedingly easy in a surveillance state like occupied Germany!

Was there an apology to the NPD? Was there an admission that there was a rush to judgment without sufficient evidence? Will anti-nazi Mannichl be indicted for making fraudulent statements?

To ask it is to answer it. Of course not.

Now, a little more than two years after the incident, a human chain is to be formed to keep the “right wing extremists” from honoring their slaughtered ancestors.

In a future post, I will document the extent to which censorship has already been put in place in Germany, and increasingly, here as well.

The Gulag is being constructed all around us, brick by brick. But this time, not a shot will need to be fired. The memory of Dresden stands as a reminder of what our rulers can do and will do if necessary. But they also have learned that mind-control is a much more convenient form of power than shooting guns.  No blood to mop up. Much cleaner.

Tags:

The Prima Facie Case for Holocaust Research

Posted by T on January 30, 2010
20th century, Current Discourse, History / 14 Comments

The “holocaust” story Continue reading…

Tags:

The Baader-Meinhof Gang: Movie and Introduction

Posted by T on December 26, 2009
By Title, Current Discourse, Movies / 1 Comment

The movie Der Baader-Meinhof Komplex, 2008, chronicles the first and most Continue reading…

The Manhattan Declaration

Posted by T on November 28, 2009
Current Discourse / 20 Comments

An Anglican priest is supposed to have lamented, “Wherever St. Paul went, a riot Continue reading…

Introductory criticism of Wilson’s “‘Reformed’ is Not Enough”

Posted by T on November 24, 2009
Church, Current Discourse / 2 Comments

The book “Reformed” is Not Enough created quite a stir a few years back, inspiring Continue reading…

Tags: , ,

A Zero-Option for Iran

Posted by T on November 23, 2009
Politics / No Comments

Ronald Reagan proposed the so-called zero-option for Europe. Roughly speaking Continue reading…

Tags:

There Shall be No Night: A Play for the New Deal

Posted by T on November 17, 2009
20th century, History, Literature, Politics / No Comments

One of the embarrassments for the pro-Soviet leftists in America, including the bulk Continue reading…

Mr. Ham Introduces Miss Egenation

Posted by T on November 09, 2009
Current Discourse / 5 Comments

Ken Ham and his associates in the book under review favor interracial marriage Continue reading…

Tags: ,

World Series 2009: Reflections on Baseball for our Führer

Posted by T on October 18, 2009
Agrarianism, sports / 1 Comment

Reality often seems to overpower romance, so I need to get this post off as soon Continue reading…

Current events: Baseball and ‘Bama

Posted by T on October 09, 2009
Current Flux, Politics, sports / 4 Comments

1. Matt Holliday dropped a straight-forward fly, and as a result of that one botch Continue reading…

The Hamites and the Hitler

Posted by T on October 05, 2009
20th century, Current Discourse, History / 6 Comments

In the book under review, Ham et al. make the inevitable appeal to Hitler Continue reading…

Tags: , ,

Ham on the extent of genetic differences between the races

Posted by T on September 17, 2009
Current Discourse / 2 Comments

Ham et al. claim that there is only 0.2% genetic difference between any two races, Continue reading…

Tags: ,

The Suburban Slum

Posted by M on September 10, 2009
Aesthetics, Agrarianism / 9 Comments

This is a good introduction to the problems with suburbia.  The speaker has Continue reading…

Ham on Racism and Evolution

Posted by T on September 01, 2009
Current Discourse / 17 Comments

Notably absent from a book purporting to be a refutation of racism is a definition Continue reading…

Tags: ,

Byron, Frisbianity, Leibniz’s Law, and Propositional Attitudes

Posted by M on August 01, 2009
Current Discourse, Ethics / No Comments

Let us suppose that the following identity statement is true Continue reading…