Politics

The Electoral College

Posted by T on November 14, 2016
Politics / No Comments

Venerators of one-man one-vote democracy have long groused about the Electoral College. They think the President should be elected by a strict tally of individuals. But the Electoral College is a remnant of the old world, and as such needs to be preserved against the modern attack on it. Indeed, it should be beefed up.

When democracy started to re-emerge in the Middle Ages centuries after the demise of Athens, the idea was that two classes of men — nobles and clergy — would meet amongst their own to approve — or not — measures proposed by the king. The estates were active throughout the duchies and principalities of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, and the Emperor himself was elected. Later, a third “estate” — the townsmen — emerged in response to socio-economic developments. No estate could levy a tax on a different estate, nor could the king, without that estate’s cooperation. Similar developments took place in France and England. The United States were based on the model of people organized into, not estates, but states. This is what the Electoral College is all about.

One advantage is resisting regional domination. Suppose one candidate promises the westerners that he will create a water pipeline from the east to permanently solve their water problem. So nearly 100% of their population votes for that one, while the rest of the states are closely divided on this side or that, because other issues are more important to them. The Electoral College tends to minimize the imbalance: a modest but wide-spread majority will tend to overcome an overwhelming majority in one region. This remedy failed in the election of Lincoln with 40% of the popular vote, but that was due to the division of conservatives into three factions. No system is fail-safe.

Another reason why the Electoral College was sensible, nay absolutely necessary, can be illustrated very easily.

Many people think that before the 19th Amendment, women were not allowed to vote. This is not quite true. Before the 19th Amendment, each state could permit women to vote or not. Women voted in some states quite a while before the passage of the 19th Amendment. What the 19th Amendment did was say: you are not allowed to be a state unless you permit women to vote. That, and only that, is what the 19th Amendment accomplished.

Now imagine the situation before the 19th was passed, and let us suppose a populous state like New York allows women to vote, but the others do not. Instantly, there are twice as many eligible voters in New York than there were before. Yet the number of residents stays the same.

What the Electoral College does is quarantine each state, so that no matter how crazy they become internally, their overall effect on the vote is not exaggerated. The Electoral College prevents a competitive situation arising between states to expand their number of voters.

It might be thought that by making the qualifications for voting uniform nationally, this problem goes away. However, why should we want national uniformity of voting standards? The 26th amendment gave 18-year-olds the right to vote, based on a specious argument about the draft: if you can be forced to die for your country, you ought at least to be able to help choose those who can start wars. (But girls and pointy-heads were not drafted: if the reasoning were honest, it would have said instead, “anyone who has served in the military is eligible to vote.” Moreover, why does the Left think 18 year-olds are wise enough to choose a President, but cannot be trusted to buy beer?) Let such reasoning be confined to the sillier states — but without increasing their share of the total vote. A uniform standard doesn’t help anyway. A crazy place like California can invite millions of aliens in and let them vote. Dead people have been voting in Baltimore and Philadelphia for decades. We don’t want those deads and aliens canceling out our votes.

Of course, the Electoral College as currently defined is only a partial sandbag against California craziness — every ten years, a new census leads to a greater apportionment of delegates, even if they don’t vote. So the Electoral College as currently defined is not enough of a sandbag against unjust influence of the crazies. Here is my modest proposal for reforming it therefore. Let each state have exactly one vote in the Electoral College. That would be better.

The Californians scream, that’s not fair! look at all the people we have!

Exactly.

And now comes… a new onslaught of PCA racial overtures

Posted by T on June 16, 2016
Churchianity, Man's Religions, Politics / 3 Comments

The PCA is ready to repent of its sins again. It was almost ten years ago Continue reading…

Tags: , ,

Book. Richard Maybury, World War 1.

Posted by T on May 29, 2016
Ethics, History, Politics / No Comments

This is an introduction to WW1 purporting to be written as a series of letters by Continue reading…

Tags: , ,

America and the Sicilian Mafia

Posted by T on April 20, 2016
History, Politics / No Comments

Today is the 127th anniversary of Continue reading…

Tags:

Trump: Are we about to be Souterized?

Posted by T on February 24, 2016
Politics / 4 Comments

Pretty much the whole Right Wing has lined up behind Trump, and I have Continue reading…

Protected: Racial Reconciliation and the PCA

Posted by T on September 29, 2015
Churchianity, Documentary, Politics / Enter your password to view comments.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Tags: ,

Leo Frank: The Crime of the Century

Posted by T on August 17, 2015
Ethics, History, Politics / No Comments

Hundred year anniversaries worth celebrating do not come up Continue reading…

Tags:

There is Life in the Old Land(s) Yet!

Posted by T on August 08, 2015
Politics / No Comments

The confederate battle flag surrender made the front page of the mighty Continue reading…

Tags:

Supreme Court Rejects Fag Marriage in a Landslide

Posted by T on June 28, 2015
Judaica, Politics / 2 Comments

The goyish part of the Court, that is. Continue reading…

Tags:

Patton and the Sad Sack

Posted by T on May 24, 2015
By Title, Ethics, Movies, Politics / 2 Comments

Patton is one of the top five movies ever — in the elite group Continue reading…

Tags:

Jews-only games are fine, just fine! Wunderbar in fact!

Posted by T on April 22, 2015
Judaica, Politics / No Comments

The “European Maccabiah Games,” Continue reading…

Tags:

Donald Sterling Meme

Posted by T on May 01, 2014
Politics / No Comments

Donald Jew Sterling is wrong, but only where the kikenpress is Continue reading…

Tags:

Nutrisystem Genocide

Posted by T on June 06, 2013
Politics / 3 Comments

It’s been over a year now, but it still rankles. Continue reading…

Put down that baseball bat, nasty felon

Posted by T on February 23, 2013
Politics / 1 Comment

I have often speculated that “gun-free zones” that surround us mean Continue reading…

Hurray Buffalo!

Posted by T on June 09, 2012
Politics / 5 Comments

When Dabney some years after the war saw the people of Richmond Continue reading…

Tags: