First Word

Actually not just honkies either, as we will see.

While my car was in for repairs recently, I needed to use Uber a couple times. They have a cool feature on their app that shows where the car that is coming to pick you up is, in real time. Only this time, the little symbol for the car was a rainbow flag.

You know how it is: you’ve already paid the fare up front, and you need to get somewhere, so you just set your face like a flint and determine to get through the ride and move on. But you’re thinking: Why would this guy risk offending patrons by picking an icon that celebrates sodomy, when that has nothing to do with turning tricks as a cabbie?

The driver turned out to be a Christian Negro that started witnessing to me! After clarifying the situation, I asked him why then he chose the fag flag as his car icon. “What?! What are talking about!” It turned out, he not only didn’t pick it, he didn’t even know that is how his car appears on the app. It was foisted on him by Uber management, not only without his consent, but even without his knowledge.

This is emblematic of what many internet corporations are becoming. Pretending to be champions of the oppressed, they are actually ruthless oppressors. 

But in Uber’s case, it is much worse, as they slather that over with a thick varnish of hypocritical virtue signaling. I received an email letter from them, I think last October, signed by Persian CEO Dara Khosrowshahi. It is worth interacting with that letter. I will indent his words, then dialogue with them.

Let me start by saying I wish I never had to send this email.

Oh but you didn’t have to, Dara, you really didn’t.

I wish that the lives of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and countless others weren’t so violently cut short. I wish that institutional racism, and the police violence it gives rise to, didn’t cause their deaths. 

This is question begging. Police violence is caused first, because rampant Negro violence can only be met with other violence. But also — and this should worry everyone —, because the Left has militarized the police in preparation for their ultimate lockdown, and to this end hires the IDF to provide training (google to find many more links). Some of our police departments are being trained by Israelis to be as inhuman as Israel herself. That is the real story, but not on Dara’s radar.

Even so, hundreds of Negroes’ lives are cut short at the hands of other Negroes for every one that is gunned down by police. Yet this evidently does not worry Dara.

I wish that all members of our Black community felt safe enough to move around their cities without fear. 

Oh but they do, they do. I guess Dara has never ventured into the “bad sections” of an American city yet, probably because he was warned they are “not safe.”  As a foreigner, Dara perhaps thought that meant he was not safe from the police. No, Dara: it is code word for too many niggers.

It’s true that not “all members” of the Black community feel safe to move around their cities. This was made clear to me after the Rodney King riots. Several Negresses were interviewed after the National Guard moved in and (no doubt to the news producers’ shock) explained that for the first time ever, they felt safe walking around the hood.

Black people fear being attacked by ghetto niggers even more than White people do.

… As a company, we believe that everyone has the right to move freely, no matter where they live or the color of their skin. We’re proud of how Uber has helped improve transportation equity over the last decade. But the reality remains that Black Americans often don’t feel safe to move freely in many places around our country. And they still face enormous barriers that others do not.

It’s just the opposite. Blacks feel free to go anywhere, but Whites do not. Or more precisely: Blacks feel free to go into any White neighborhood, but Whites (and Blacks) do not feel free to go into any Black neighborhood. Why does Dara lie?

We know there is no easy solution to the problems we have faced for centuries.

Who’s “we” Sucka? Would you please go back home? Maybe you could help rebuild the Persian empire, rather than helping destroy our republic?

We also know that we need to devote our time, energy and resources toward making a difference. That’s why we’re making a number of commitments that we will uphold not just this week, but for years to come:

• • We are committed to driving lasting change through criminal justice reform. On Sunday, we announced a $1 million donation to the Equal Justice Initiative and Center for Policing Equity to support their important work in making racial justice in America more than just a promise.

Let’s overlook your rank Sabbath-violation, Dara. If you are exercised about justice and equality, maybe you could pay your drivers a little bit more? Most of the drivers I have had are Negroes, by the way, trying to scrape out some coin. These millions of dollars piled up for you to throw around were earned on their backs. Your well-healed San Francisco staff is luxuriating on their sweat and toil. I think they call this irony?

• • We are committed to creating a community that treats everyone equally and with dignity. We do not tolerate discrimination, harassment or racism on our platform, as outlined in our Community Guidelines. We will hold everyone who uses Uber accountable to these standards of basic respect and human decency. 

Every one of your drivers groans when a ride pops up in the nigger hood — even the Negro drivers. Especially the Negro drivers. At least with Uber, in contrast to traditional cabs, the fare is pre-paid so it won’t be a ride-and-bail. That’s something. But the fear of being kidnapped, raped, and drowned in a bathtub of lye — or even just shot in the back of the head to grab $20 and a cell phone — is still in the back of their mind. The Negro drivers do not worry when the fare is from the cracker hood.

• • I respectfully ask anyone not willing to abide by these rules to delete Uber.

What rules? And how can a honky violate them? You click for a ride, the ride comes, you ride.

• • We are committed to supporting the Black community. As a starting point, we will use Uber Eats to promote Black-owned restaurants while making it easier for you to support them, with no delivery fees for the remainder of the year. And in the coming weeks, we will offer discounted rides to Black-owned small businesses, who have been hit hard by COVID-19, to help in their recovery.

Non-negro eateries (not just Honky, but Chinese, Mexican, and Indian eateries) will subsidize Negro eateries. Non-negro businesses (not just Honky, but Chinese, Mexican, and Indian businesses) will subsidize Negro businesses. How do I know this? Because the money has to come from somewhere. I’m quite sure Dara will not be paying this tab from his own personal savings.

• • We are committed to making Uber a diverse and inclusive place for people of color to work and thrive. While we have more work to do, we have tied our senior executives’ pay to measurable progress on our diversity goals, and will continue to publish data on our workforce so the public can hold us accountable. We’re also committed to expanding opportunities for drivers and delivery people, including through education opportunities and skills training.

Every working “person of color” reading that bit about “senior executives’ pay” is going to say, “there they go again.” Here is a suggestion for Dara that would actually make working “persons of color” get excited about the honesty and integrity of his concern: let no “senior executive” earn a penny more than the highest-paid driver makes in a year.

“Well, uh, we can’t go that far. Our people spent four years getting a college degree, and another two for the MBA. And it costs a lot to live in San Francisco.” Excuse me, all that is just more White Privilege, right? Now is your chance to cancel all that privilege.

Let us concede that even the drivers probably think management should make more than they do. So make the rule, “no one in corporate will make more than twice the earnings of the highest-paid driver.” 

Not enough? How about three-times then?

I’m pretty sure your executives are compensated more on the order of 100 times the best-paid drivers. Not even counting the wear-and-tear on the drivers’ vehicles.

Lastly, let me speak clearly and unequivocally: Black Lives Matter.

Well Dara, your virtue signaling actually shows more sensitivity to Current Politics than to Black Lives.

And, you don’t pay Them very much.

The sub-text of your virtue signaling, and your actual behavior, suggests that Black Lives really don’t matter very much to you.

The Bolsheviks, it turns out, did not picture a future where everyone would take a turn at the assembly line in between meetings to vote on production goals. No, they envisaged a future where they, the Bolsheviks would be in charge, while the peasants and proles would carry on.

Promoting sodomy against the wishes of their own serfs, paying them next to nothing, all while virtue-signaling to the world — I wish I could say that Uber is unique, but we are seeing this kind of behavior all around.

Review of book “What’s ax murder, anyway?” (bio. info at end).

The author, Carly Jew Manes, noticed that there were no books introducing ax murder to children under the age of 13, and observed that she knows “how important it is to ensure that everyone has the resources they need to have intentional, compassionate, and nonjudgmental conversations about ax killings with the young people in their lives.”

After carefully defining exactly what it even means to kill someone with an ax, the keynote chapter then deals with reasons one might want to do so, emphasizing that “it is important to us that this book does not perpetuate the ideology that there ‘good’ reasons or ‘bad’ reasons to do someone in with an ax.” The most important thing is to show great compassion to someone driven to perpetuate the ax killing. Hugs and kisses are called for, not asking questions that might be perceived to be embarrassing.

An interesting chapter surveys the history of ax killings. In previous generations, only the rich could afford a high quality whetstone to keep their axes sharp. As a result, the axes of ordinary people tended to be dull. They could still do the job, but it required many more blows, as well more upper body strength and stamina. Not only did this make the job more difficult in general, but according to the stereotypes of the time, this gave an unfair advantage to men over women. It also made the job more distasteful — more like a bludgeoning than just a few clean cuts to the vital areas. Fortunately, mass production today finally has equalized much of that inequity, by making whetstones and even electric grinding wheels affordable by nearly every American, regardless of race or gender. Everyone now has access to a nice, clean, and sharp ax.

In the chapter “What more can we do to help?” the author hints that America should send aid to poor countries so they can also afford more grinding machines and whetstones. 

As the Kirkus review insightfully observes, “most of the pictures by illustrator Emulsify depict smiling, happy people of diverse races, abilities, and gender identities; bright interiors; or attractive landscapes and flowers, boosting the affirmative tone.”

Carly Manes. What’s an Abortion, Anyway? (https://www.whatsanabortionbook.com)

It has become common and tedious for the American Right Wing to ridicule Sleepy Joe and endlessly show montages of all his gaffes. I am not even speaking of the treasonous “Right” like Lindsey Graham and Sean Hannity, who cynically want to parlay the natural disgust felt by every decent person into a political surge that will make possible the military furtherance of the interests of that Middle Eastern desert tribe venerated by Dispensationalists. No, I am talking even about good guys like Mark Dice and Tucker Carlson.

The error is both moral, and misses the elephant in the parlor.

1. Biden ran in 1988 and was forced to withdraw when it came out that he had cheated in law school. 
2. Granted, he lost the election in 2020, but it still remains the case that tens of millions of people did vote for him and thus a major part of the electorate is no longer concerned that he cheated through law school.
3. From a moral standpoint, which is worse, being a cheater, or being senile?
4. From the standpoint of taking the oath of office, same question.
5. Obviously, this man has lost his mind, but equally obviously (and for the same reason), he is not the power at the helm. He did not orchestrate the election theft that put him in office. It was not he that thought of nominating a thoroughly termite cabinet. He did not define the policy for Covid, the Ukraine, printing up of trillions of dollars, or establishing a Ministry of Truth. Others are coming up with all these ideas.
6. But none of our leaders dares to name the real power behind the throne. Tucker comes as close as anyone dare, but still does not cross the line.

What follows from (5) is inescapable: Biden’s dementia is not some kind of embarrassment to the Left: it is their glory. It’s as if to say, “we not only stole the election, but we did it to put a retarded degenerate in office — one that we control down to the very words he attempts to read off the teleprompter — and there’s nothing you can do about it except mock and whine.”

So we are in a real fix. We can hear the loud buzz of termites eating up the joists that hold up our house. But we dare not say, “termites are eating up the house.” That would be anti-Termitism.

I actually fear a Republican surge in the mid-terms. It won’t mean that election fraud has been solved — nay, the fraudsters may even orchestrate an exaggerated amount of electoral backlash, since the stage is now set for Republicans to play their appointed role: get America into war. 

If conservatives don’t wake up over the next six months, that is likely just what will happen, and it is not a pleasant thought. This is why the montages of Joe’s senility scare me. Every chuckle chuckle puts another nail into our coffin, unless God decree our rescue in a manner that cannot be foreseen.

Somehow I got pulled into the NCAA basketball tournament this year, for the first time in decades, literally. The week before, it was the ACC tournament. I watched a lot of it, having done my grad work at an ACC school during the Ralph Sampson era. We played against guys like James Worthy and Michael Jordan. There were quirky coaches, like Lefty Driesell and that funny Italian from the Bronx. There were ancient rivalries. Coach Krzyzewski started at Duke, and the Duke Athletic Director explained at a press conference that “this wasn’t his second choice.” The ACC was a small, southern conference that often fielded four Final Four-worthy teams, though it could not come to that because of the brackets. The tournaments were held in Greensboro, NC, preceded by a famous tail-gating ritual.

Now, they have added 4 or 5 Yankee teams, and now they have a tournament that takes itself too seriously, yet played it in Brooklyn, even though none of their expanded roster of teams is even from Brooklyn.

I’m pretty sure the reduced fan set that attended (there were lots of empty seats) did not feel safe tail-gating outside the venue. But the TV revenues for the conference owners were probably spectacular.

Why do I mention all this? Because both the ACC and then the culminating NCAA have changed so much that they can serve as an index to our national decline over the last 40 years.

1. The NCAA and ESPN are continuing the lie referring to this as the “men’s tournament” and the “men’s teams.” It is a lie. An arrant lie. Girls can try out for these teams. There is no exclusion by sex. 

Why do they do it? The only reason I can think of, is that there is also a “woman’s tournament.” Prior to the tranny phenomenon (more on that soon), only females could try out for the girl’s team. Thus, it was exclusionary by sex, intentionally so. 

So there was indeed a “women’s” team, and tournament. But why do they lie and say there is also a “men’s” tournament?

I think it is an attempt to distract the American couch potatoes from noticing the obvious asymmetry. By repeating the lie often enough, the couch potatoes start to think that “there just always has been men’s and women’s tournaments; why would anyone think otherwise? Why ask why?”

2. This insight segues then naturally to the Buick commercials during the tournament. 

It showed ominous animated conspiratorial text against a dark background:

ON APRIL 1, 2018…

ARIKE OGUNBOWALE…

HIT ONE OF THE GREATEST BUZZER BEATERS… 

IN NCAA HISTORY.

**** BUT ****

YOU PROBABLY DIDN’T SEE IT.

OVER ** 40 % ** OF ATHLETES ARE WOMEN,

BUT THEY GET LESS THAN ** 10% ** OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE.

BUICK IS COMMITTED TO RAISING THAT PERCENTAGE.

http://firstword.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/buick-woke.mov

Buick has a whole series of these, with varying first lines.

ON MARCH 20, 2015…

MISSY FRANKLIN…

SWAM ONE OF THE GREATEST RACES…

IN NCAA HISTORY

and so forth.

First of all, Buick, one of the greatest buzzer beaters in junior high history took place on a sandlot near you, but you probably didn’t see that either. Not to take anything away from little Billy, but the world is not out of joint because you didn’t see his sinker.

Second, the “percentage of athletes that are women” (by which they mean, what? professional plus school-organized? organized under any auspices? I doubt anyone at Buick could answer this) would be approx. 0, except for being subsidized and puffed by subversive cucks like you, Buick.

Third, it wouldn’t matter if they had 90% of the media coverage, few would be interested in watching it — least of all, other women.

3. I mentioned “prior to the tranny phenomenon.” Adidas stepped up to the plate with their own perverse subversion. Here is the voice-over on their video:

It’s impossible

to take hold of the world’s spotlight overnight,

create your own uniform,

be a cover model,

a powerful athlete,

or compete as a trans-woman.

Impossible? No. I’m possible.

During the words, “compete as a trans woman,” the video shows a male dressed up like a girl spiking the volleyball down the throats of the terrified girls on the other team.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fujboh-W7Sk

This pushing of “trans women competing,” meaning males dressed up as girls stealing the gold medals from women’s sporting, can only mean the demise of girls’ sports. It means that men get to show their superiority in sports, even in spaces that were carved out for females.

I think it would be good for the subsidized organized sports for girls to end. But that’s the Right-wing position. The point here is that the Left’s narrative is self-contradictory. Yet they persist in it self-consciously. They are demonic.

4. But the girls at the tournament that still want to look and act cute — namely, the cheerleaders, were singled out to wear corona-hoax masks. The grunting players spewing spit and sweat did not have to wear masks, nor the coaches, nor, obviously, the fans, but this docile group of girls sitting in their assigned square and waving their arms did have to.

(Full disclosure: most of the score-keepers were also wearing masks.)

The cheerleaders provide us momentary visual relief at times from the tension of the game. By masking them up, the image of God is effaced. This gives further evidence of the demonic nature of the NCAA organizers.

(I noticed that in the late rounds, the cheerleaders weren’t wearing masks anymore. Did people complain and the NCAA relented? Or was it based on local option? Don’t expect answers from the announcers.)

5. The Jesuit school St. Peter’s weighed in on racial justice by having (or allowing) players to wear shirts saying “Black lives matter” and “No Racism.” Which is pretty idiotic, given that 80% of the players are black while 90% of the adoring fans are white. Or maybe that is the racism — we need set-asides for more white players. But I doubt that’s what they meant.

The NCAA itself ran extended commercials showing a montage of sports scenes (emphasis on women) and BLM and other fist-raising marches. As if the latter has any rational connection to basketball.

But it is an implied threat of violence against any who would protest what they have become.

It is subversion. It is demonic.

All of this probably seems pretty commonplace to those that have been “plugged in” all along. You need someone with fresh eyes like myself to see what is hidden in plain sight.

Our eschatology assures us that the men that are promulgating these perversions will soon be in the lake of fire. I imagine that the Buick and Adidas executives that approved these commercials will probably plead, “we just hired a PR firm, and they assured us that everyone is doing this.” It won’t wash on the Great Day. They need to be warned that they are heading for the eternal gas chamber no less than the leaders of NCAA and the PR firms.

I thought they had taken him out for good, but here: https://stormer-daily.rw

Spread the word to everyone you can think of.

Anglin is, quite simply, the most brilliant thinker on the web.

I give AA full credit for the election of Trump in 2016.

This is why, starting in 2017, they used every trick in the book to silence him:

• Cancel paypal
• Cancel checking account
• Steal his URL
• Steal his domain registration
• Remove Cloudfare
• Steal his ISP
• Generate frivolous lawsuits and get “tribal” judges to give outrageous awards

Trump did nothing to oppose this, and it cost him the election in 2020. With google searches and fundraising, I believe Andrew could have single-handedly resisted the Corona hoax and the mail-in ballots.

Instead, Trump did nothing, and this only put the Left into a deeper frenzy of cancellation — finally culminated in the cancellation of the President of the United States! The chutzpah of these people is only matched by the passive compliance of the “opposition.”

But think how outrageous this is. I thought we were obligated to use the Federal Reserve System of legal tender, with the tacit agreement that anyone could use the system, since they indeed must use the system. Of course, the authorities would have the right to deprive a convicted felon of such use, by legal means: but not “private” banks.

I thought the internet was free for anyone to use. Not for illegal activities, but certainly for the exercise of free speech.

The cucking of America is shown in that not one mainstream politician or reporter, save only Tucker, even found this persecution worth mentioning, let alone resisting. Lewrockwell.com discussed the “problem,” but couldn’t sully their lips by mentioning Daily Stormer or Andrew Anglin.

These are dark days. Somehow, Andrew has found a way to shine his light into our dark place. Read, ponder, and reform your language and your thinking, while there is still this small opportunity.

No rational person can believe that the 2020 election was not stolen, despite YouTube’s and Twitter’s schoolmarmish interposing of their own view to anyone that dissents.

I think without the cheating, Trump not only would have won with a landslide exceeding that of Reagan in 84, but his coattails would have given him the House and a filibuster-proof Senate. 

In other words, there is no reason to think the cheating was limited to the “swing states,” and this point has not been made often enough.

Its Origin

The question is whether at its origin it is a random natural mutation of some virus that started to spread out by natural association, or an intentional creation of evil men. The girls at Yahoo have already declared the answer to this. A word or two needs to be said to author Kate Holland. First, you should not feign a scolding, personal tone in your headline. You are a bimbette. It is your part to listen and learn, not scold. Second, wondering if the virus was created in a lab is an historical hypothesis, not a conspiracy theory. It is a perfectly natural question to raise, even if the answer turns out to be negative. Third, the virus being a “lab construct” is not the same concept as being a conspiracy. It could escape from a lab in a variety of ways not involving a conspiracy — by accident, or by the machinations of a single perp. Conversely, it could involve a conspiracy while not being a “lab construct.” Labs hold all kinds of naturally-occurring pestilences, not excluding even the Bubonic Plague. In short, there is no entailment in either direction between conspiracy and lab construct. Finally, Bimbette, does it not make you wonder why a “study” was conducted on this question just now by medical scientists, rather than them working frantically on a vaccine, cure, better analysis, or just general aid to the distressed? It’s almost as if they had an answer in search of a proof.

The story of the Negro takeover of the northern cities is simple in broad outline, but complex in the detail. E. Michael Jones’ book The Slaughter of Cities required 668 pages counting indexes. Very few Americans of my acquaintance are aware of this history. People younger than around 50 probably assume that your typical American city has simply always been a Negro hellhole; they probably think that the few islands of civilization that still remain are the result of gentrification; but this is not at all the case. Most of the transformation took place during a typical Boomer’s lifetime. In addition, most people (except those actually raised in northern cities in the 50s and 60s) think that racial tension is a Southern thing. This is almost the opposite of the actual case. The South is unique in tempering the tensions of life near Negroes with some grace and humor. Its segregation was legal, leaving much room for affection in the gaps. Segregation in the North was not by law: it was all done at the street level, and left little place for affection. I will try to summarize the main outlines of the story, so everyone can at least be vaguely aware, and hopefully, have their appetites whetted to dive into Jones’ opus. It will require several posts. In this installment, I want to focus just on how Whites at that time were able to organize and push back, something that seems inconceivable today. It can serve as a note of encouragement on this day our rulers have set aside to honor this most wicked man, Martin Luther King, Jr.

First the bird’s eye view. There had been a trickle of Negro incursion into the North since the Civil War, but it was negligible compared to what was to come. World War II gave the double impetus for the mass migration: a large number of the country’s youth were drafted into the Army at the same time that there was a huge and artificial demand for industrial output. That is, there was a sudden increase in demand for factory labor at just the time that the local supply was crimped. The solution was to comb through the South and recruit sharecroppers with the lure of high factory wages and easier living. And recruited they were. Vast numbers of Negroes started pouring into virtually every northern industrial city. They continued to pour in after the war was over. The traditional ghettoes were bursting at the seams, so lots of new areas to live were needed.

So much for Act I, setting the stage for the conflict.

The prologue also needs to be written, and is not covered by Jones. This is the fact that the bulk of the Anglo-Saxon (and German and Scandinavian and Huguenot and Hungarian) Protestant people had drifted out to the suburbs, or soon would. The cities were settled in a quilt-like patchwork of specific ethnic, and Catholic, neighborhoods: Poles, Italians, Irish, Czechs, Lithuanians, each clustered in somewhat homogenous patches of the city, each with its parish cathedral.

Why the Protestants tended to diffuse while the Catholics tended to hang together ethnically is a story that I would love to learn about: I wish Mr. Jones might tackle that. For this book, it is taken as a presupposition.

We need to remember that the villains in the story are rarely the Negroes. Left to natural development, but hedged in by White culture, and the noose always waiting when needed, the Negroes would have settled in their own sections and lived relatively peaceful, happy lives, with jobs provided by Whites, police protection provided by Whites, welfare provided by Whites, medical care provided by Whites, and infrastructure provided by Whites. They would have worked enough to get by, made music and whoopy, gotten drunk, and taken naps.

No, the villains of the story, by which the Negro was turned into the unwitting shock troops for a relentless, physical war on American Christendom, are almost completely jews and White liberals, especially Quakers, but also the Catholic intelligentsia, the corrupted WASP establishment, Rockefeller, and the richly endowed foundations. Even the Negroes recruited into the war, such as King himself, were largely pawns of larger, sinister forces. This does not let Marin off the hook. King was a very evil man, but would have just been another locally-contained evil man, just another lascivious preacher, had it not been for his sponsorship by jews, communists, and other revolutionaries.

I want to focus on Chicago during King’s campaign. Lots of the Chicago story took place before King was ever on the scene, so some backfill will be needed later, but we need to honor the day.

In Chicago, the strategy followed by King and the civil rightsers in general had shifted from voter registration, which had been the focus in the South, to staging grand marches through white neighborhoods to protest — well, to protest what? Jones asks. That Poles exist and live there? What exactly were they protesting? “King’s gift for moving masses of people had now been grafted on a Quaker campaign of manipulating the real-estate market for political ends that only worked when no one knew it was occurring. This unthinking combination of the movement’s northern and southern strategies was a formula for disaster” (p. 504).

What King couldn’t seem to reckon with was the stiffness of the resistance that his marches were met with.

It is hard to imagine what happened, given our familiarity with passive and pudgy Whites that will accept any depredation with scarcely a whimper of protest. How different it was 50 years ago.

On Friday afternoon, fifty protesters arrived outside the Gage Park office of the Halvorsen Realty Company, fully intending to stay there until Saturday morning. Once darkness fell, the demonstrators realized that they had miscalculated when a mob of 1,000 angry counter-demonstrators surrounded them and began taunting them and pelting them with missiles of various sorts. When it became clear that the police were incapable of protecting the demonstrators, they persuaded them to break off their protest, which the protesters did, retreating to their cars under a hail of rocks and bottles.

The protesters responded to Friday’s failure by redoubling their efforts. This time instead of fifty demonstrators, they marched 500 into the neighborhood itself, creating another hostile mob which again unleashed another barrage of rocks and bottles, which this time hit both Al Raby and Jesse Jackson. (504)

However, what was particularly vicious about the second day’s protest is that it was preceded by a staged “inter-racial picnic” in a local park featuring Negroes consorting with Aryanesses, some of whom feigned being pregnant using pillows under their blouses. (It would be interesting to find out where the girls were recruited from — the University of Chicago’s Sociology Department?) This was clearly psychological terror, as having your way with the women is the primary mark of having conquered a people. The demonstration would have no impact on “housing,” it was just meant to demoralize (though it back-fired in this case, as Jones insightfully explains). But we need to be aware that the ceaseless depiction of Negroes with Aryanesses on TV, in advertisements, in movies, is part of a relentless campaign to humiliate and demoralize the White man. Knowing it will help you to resist, brother!

The same thing happened when Martin Luther King arrived back in town to lead the march against the Lithuanians in Marquette Park. King stepped out of his car and was almost immediately hit on the head with a rock, a blow which dropped him to his knees…. After the protesters parked their cars and marched off into the neighborhood to protest the fact that the people who lived there lived there, the Lithuanians located the easily identifiable cars of the outsiders who had just driven into the neighborhood and then dropped lighted flares in their gas tanks. The ensuing fires further demoralized the protesters by attacking them from the rear and cutting off, at least symbolically, their ability to retreat… All in all, fifteen automobiles were torched before the police brought the area under control. One policeman’s clearest memory of the Marquette Park march was Al Raby running for his life down 71st Street. (505)

Nevertheless, “the more he failed to achieve his goal, the more King redoubled his efforts along the same lines which caused the failure in the first place.”

The Lafayette Plan, on the other hand, favored the clandestine Quaker approach based on move-ins, and Lafayette was now convinced the King’s southern strategy was jeopardizing whatever gains the Quakers had already made in the Chicago area. King’s tactics ran the danger of making Catholics aware of the clandestine campaign that had already driven so many of them out of their neighborhoods. If they knew what was going on, they could stop it as effectively as they were in stopping King’s kamikaze-style marches. Unless the AFSC and SCLC differences are resolved, it was clear that the movement was about to fall apart.” (508)

The final lunge was to be a march through the section known as Cicero. This would be as symbolic as Selma, for the first anti-integration riots had famously occurred in Cicero over a decade earlier. Governor Kerner put the state police and National Guard on alert. The leadership chickened out, but the new breed of young Negroes defiantly went in anyway.

A rump group managed to round up 200 people and send them to Cicero, accompanied by 2,700 National Guard troops and 700 police who were more or less successful in keeping the much larger crowd of counter-demonstrators from killing them. When it became apparent that the march was going nowhere, the demonstrators beat a retreat under a steady barrage of rocks and bottles. (511)

“King was clearly shaken by his experience in Chicago” (511).

Unfortunately, King’s revolution had the full backing of the Army, Navy, and Air Force of the United States, and eventually prevailed.

There are many more details of the war that are instructive, and I will continue to highlight aspects from time to time. In this vignette, I for one was very encouraged to find out how effective men in a neighborhood can be in defending themselves. It is encouraging that when it was just local powers allied with King’s revolution, the people on the street were able to defeat this Negro communist handily. We need to form bonds that are rooted in family and locality, learn how to fight, and learn how to communicate with each other through the thick jamming noise that surrounds us.

Unfortunately, much of that noise comes from the modern church.

E. Michael Jones, The Slaughter of Cities: Urban Renewal as Ethnic Cleansing. (St. Augustine, South Bend, 2004)

On this day we should all pause and remember the deliberate destruction of Dresden 73 years ago.

Today I want to direct attention briefly to how the Lugenpress continues to spin things. Take a look at this short article from AP.  Six “neo-nazis” were beaten up by fifteen masked antifas in Dresden.

• How do they know the six were neo-nazis? What does this word even denote precisely? There is no indication.
• Note how they demonize the six by designating them as “neo-nazis” in every single mention, including the headline itself. They are not Germans that happen to hold this or that view, but neo-nazi is simply what they are.
• The rally was by “far-right” extremists. But the attacking extremists are not “far-left.” They are simply leftist .
• And what is a far-right extremist? For all we know, merely protesting the napalming of innocent civilians in Dresden is ipso facto enough to count as being both far-right and “extreme.”
• Note that there is no indication that there was any violence on the part of the “neo-nazis” — and you can be sure that this would have been mentioned, nay emphasized, if there had been any.
• There is no mention that any of the violent leftists were arrested. It is a police report, but the only thing we have on authority of the police is the designation “neo-nazi.” There is the subtle sub-text that they got what they deserved, and that it is a matter of indifference whether there were any consequences for the masked leftist gangsters.

This is the way the corporate mainstream media spins things. While pastors and politicians are silent, the corporations are ever more bold and open in their Satanism.

To all appearances, things look very dire for the European tribe.  Dresden was like a nightmare created by our rulers as an earnest for what is in store for us all unless we willingly become their smiley, ever-apologetic serfs.  Unless… God intervenes to rescue us. Pray. The hour is late.

Go to Daily Stormer at least five times a day.

You get both the important news, and basic training in how to think. It is quite amazing.

The proof that this is the real deal is the fact that jews keep trying to get it shut down. It has gone through a dozen URL’s. (If it changes again, I will put the info in the comments.)

This very state of affairs indicates how dire things have become. It is not just that jews and their shabbos goys have so much power to begin with, but that there is no visible push-back from our leadership — not a peep of protest from our pastors, professors, or politicians. It is a serious concern that our people can be publicly bullied like this with the passive compliance not just of the robed leadership, but by implication, the army, navy and air force of the United States as well.

As in the book of Judges, this circumstance is destined to teach us that only God can rescue us from complete annihilation at the hands of these satanists. May He come quickly!

I think Andrew Anglin has Führer potential. It seems almost miraculous that he has been able, at such a young age, to cut through the thick smoke of semitic conditioning that surrounds our people from cradle to grave. He has not only done this in 1/3 the time it took me, but frankly my own thinking has been corrected by his insights a number of times, though I am three times his adult age.

Updated 2/3/18 — https://dailystormer.name

Updated Jul 2022 — https://stormer-daily.rw

I seriously doubt that the departments of our regime known as the CIA and FBI actually can prove that “the Russians” were behind the hacks of the DNC. However, it doesn’t really bother me much one way or the other. Several points need to be made.

1. As if the CIA isn’t doing this kind of thing and much much more continuously. It’s pretty shameless to make a fuss about others doing what they do every day.

2. Except that our regime’s interference in other nations destroys truth and starts wars. In contrast, this alleged “interference” by Russia exposes the truth and reduces the chance of wars.

3. The FBI was skeptical about the CIA’s claim, until their leaders met and Comey came to understand that Russia would have a “motive” for doing it (see around the sixth paragraph here for example).  As if motive proves deed!

4. The fact that they constantly mention Putin as a metonymy for “the Russian government” is almost proof that they are lying. For, how could they possibly know this? It is all just playing into their demonization of Putin. They probably don’t think they can overturn our election. The goal, however, is to plants memes for gaining support for future aggression against Russia and her allies.

5. If there was real concern about foreign influence on American politics, the role of Israel would occupy the next ten years of public hearings, before it would even be worth mentioning pikers like Russia. Imagine if there were an ARPAC equivalent to AIPAC. Imagine if every candidate of both parties made an obligatory trek to Moscow, kneeling down to kiss the holy Patriarch’s ring. Imagine if every debate and every speech had to mention Russia’s main policy concerns and hasten to be more prompt than the next candidate to express eternal fealty. Imagine if anyone opposing such subservience was shouted down as an “anti-Slavite” and driven out of office.

6. At the end of the day, the Wikileaks reveal truth. And “the truth is never unwholesome” as Dabney said. Now, hacking into (((Diebold machines))) and changing votes would be very bad. But the idea that you “interfere in American politics” by revealing the truth is quite amazing when you think about it.

Venerators of one-man one-vote democracy have long groused about the Electoral College. They think the President should be elected by a strict tally of individuals. But the Electoral College is a remnant of the old world, and as such needs to be preserved against the modern attack on it. Indeed, it should be beefed up.

When democracy started to re-emerge in the Middle Ages centuries after the demise of Athens, the idea was that two classes of men — nobles and clergy — would meet amongst their own to approve — or not — measures proposed by the king. The estates were active throughout the duchies and principalities of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, and the Emperor himself was elected. Later, a third “estate” — the townsmen — emerged in response to socio-economic developments. No estate could levy a tax on a different estate, nor could the king, without that estate’s cooperation. Similar developments took place in France and England. The United States were based on the model of people organized into, not estates, but states. This is what the Electoral College is all about.

One advantage is resisting regional domination. Suppose one candidate promises the westerners that he will create a water pipeline from the east to permanently solve their water problem. So nearly 100% of their population votes for that one, while the rest of the states are closely divided on this side or that, because other issues are more important to them. The Electoral College tends to minimize the imbalance: a modest but wide-spread majority will tend to overcome an overwhelming majority in one region. This remedy failed in the election of Lincoln with 40% of the popular vote, but that was due to the division of conservatives into three factions. No system is fail-safe.

Another reason why the Electoral College was sensible, nay absolutely necessary, can be illustrated very easily.

Many people think that before the 19th Amendment, women were not allowed to vote. This is not quite true. Before the 19th Amendment, each state could permit women to vote or not. Women voted in some states quite a while before the passage of the 19th Amendment. What the 19th Amendment did was say: you are not allowed to be a state unless you permit women to vote. That, and only that, is what the 19th Amendment accomplished.

Now imagine the situation before the 19th was passed, and let us suppose a populous state like New York allows women to vote, but the others do not. Instantly, there are twice as many eligible voters in New York than there were before. Yet the number of residents stays the same.

What the Electoral College does is quarantine each state, so that no matter how crazy they become internally, their overall effect on the vote is not exaggerated. The Electoral College prevents a competitive situation arising between states to expand their number of voters.

It might be thought that by making the qualifications for voting uniform nationally, this problem goes away. However, why should we want national uniformity of voting standards? The 26th amendment gave 18-year-olds the right to vote, based on a specious argument about the draft: if you can be forced to die for your country, you ought at least to be able to help choose those who can start wars. (But girls and pointy-heads were not drafted: if the reasoning were honest, it would have said instead, “anyone who has served in the military is eligible to vote.” Moreover, why does the Left think 18 year-olds are wise enough to choose a President, but cannot be trusted to buy beer?) Let such reasoning be confined to the sillier states — but without increasing their share of the total vote. A uniform standard doesn’t help anyway. A crazy place like California can invite millions of aliens in and let them vote. Dead people have been voting in Baltimore and Philadelphia for decades. We don’t want those deads and aliens canceling out our votes.

Of course, the Electoral College as currently defined is only a partial sandbag against California craziness — every ten years, a new census leads to a greater apportionment of delegates, even if they don’t vote. So the Electoral College as currently defined is not enough of a sandbag against unjust influence of the crazies. Here is my modest proposal for reforming it therefore. Let each state have exactly one vote in the Electoral College. That would be better.

The Californians scream, that’s not fair! look at all the people we have!

Exactly.

The PCA is ready to repent of its sins again. It was almost ten years ago Continue reading…

This is an introduction to WW1 purporting to be written as a series of letters by Continue reading…